PLEASE NOTE THAT TO OBTAIN DETAILS OF THE PROTOCOL YOU SHOULD REGISTER

TO OBTAIN DETAILED PROTOCOL YOU SHOULD FIRST REGISTER AT ECVAM SIS

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E

I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X

O
N
-
L
I
N
E


Protocol no. 30

THE AMES TEST

Reverse Mutation in Histidine-requiring Strains of Salmonella typhimurium (complies with OECD Guideline 471) This procedure evaluates the mutagenic potential of test chemicals by their effect on five histidine requiring strains of the bacterium, Salmonella typhimurium in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system.

CONTACT

INVITTOX 34 Stoney Street Nottingham NG1 1NB UK Tel: England - 0602 584740 Fax: England - 0602 503570

RATIONALE

The objective of this assay is to evaluate the mutagenic potential of test chemicals by studying their effect on one or more histidine requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the absence and presence of a liver metabolising system. When the cultures are exposed to a mutagen some of the bacteria undergo genetic changes due to chemical interactions resulting in reversion of the bacteria to a non-histidine-requiring state. The reverted bacteria will then grow in the absence of exogenous histidine thus providing an indication of the potential of the chemical to cause mutation. Multiple tester strains are necessary because different strains are mutated by a different class (or different classes) of compound. Other types of bacteria can also be used, e.g. tryptophan requiring strains of Escherichia coli. The basis of the test is very similar, the only difference being that the bacteria have a requirement for a different amino acid.

BASIC PROCEDURE

Nutrient broth is inoculated with the appropriate Salmonella strain (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA102) and incubated overnight. A dose rangefinder for the test chemical is carried out using strain TA100 only over a wide dose range. Bacterial culture, test chemical and S9 mix (or co-factor solution) are mixed with soft agar and then added to minimal agar plates. The plates are incubated, inverted in the dark, for 48-72 hours. After this time the number of revertant colonies are counted. A further two mutation experiments are carried out, with doses chosen on the basis of the rangefinder. The number of colonies are counted from both experiments and the mean is calculated for the individual plate counts for each dose within an experiment. Statistical analysis of the counts are carried out, and the results for mutagenicity are assessed.

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

The assay is a rapid, reliable and economical method for screening compounds of potential genetic activity at the nucleotide level. It can be used in the evaluation of many types of substances including solids, liquids, gases, and highly toxic substances. The results of several independent large-scale studies have shown that there is a good correlation between mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in mammals. A large database has been accumulated with this assay, confirming its ability to detect genetically active compounds of most chemical classes with an efficiency of about 80%. The results obtained may be combined and correlated with the results of other tests (e.g. in vitro mammalian cell assays and in vitro cytogenetic assays) to evaluate the possible mutagenic risk of a test chemical. The following bacterial strains, amongst others, are used in this assay: Type of mutation in Strain the histidine gene TA98 frame-shift TA100 base-pair substitution TA1535 base-pair substitution TA1537 frame-shift TA102 base-pair substitution The two standard testing strains (TA1535 and TA1537) are used in combination with the strains, TA98, TA100 and TA102, which include the plasmid pKM101 as well as their particular histidine gene mutation. The plasmid derivatives (TA98, TA100 and TA102) have an increased sensitivity to certain mutagens as the pKM101 plasmid codes for an error-prone DNA repair system. Strain TA102 has its histidine gene mutation located on a multicopy plasmid, pAQ1. This strain is particularly sensitive to the activity of oxidative mutagens and cross-linking agents. In addition to the histidine mutation, most of the tester strains possess two additional mutations that greatly increase their sensitivity to mutagens: one causes the loss of the excision repair system (this mutation is not present in strain TA102) and the other, loss of the lipopolysaccharide barrier that coats the surface of the bacteria. Mutational events are rare, therefore it is essential that large populations of bacteria are used in mutagenicity testing. Maximum sensitivity is achieved by plating around 108 bacteria although there are conflicting opinions as to what is the optimum concentration. If fewer bacteria are plated, the number of spontaneous revertants may be normal but the number of induced revertants may be low for a particular concentration of mutagen. Some substances cannot be tested using the standard Ames test because their physical nature precludes it. However, the basic procedure can be adapted:- Volatile materials can be tested at reduced temperatures or at raised pressure. Alternatively, chemicals which are volatile, or relatively water insoluble, can be tested in Petri dishes containing the relevant tester strain plus the S9 mix in soft agar overlay. The plates are then exposed to known concentrations (v/v) of the compound in air. Substances with low solubilities or diffusion rates can be tested but produce results which are qualitative rather than quantitative in nature. Bactericidal substances may be studied using the liquid suspension assay method. For most mutagens there is a linear dose-response over a certain concentration range. The number of revertants per plate reported for any mutagen should be taken from this region of the curve. Excessive bacterial killing by a mutagen causes a decrease in the number of revertants on the plate. If only one concentration was tested on the downhill part of the curve it would be easy to obtain a misleading result on the quantitative activity of a particular mutagen. Over several years, a large data base of results has been accumulated which has confirmed its ability to detect genetically active compounds of most chemical classes with an efficiency of 80%. Background lawn The agar contains a trace of histidine which allows all the bacteria to undergo several divisions thus producing a faint background lawn of bacteria. DNA replication is necessary in many cases for mutagenesis to occur and therefore the background lawn provides a good indicator of the inhibition of growth caused by the test chemical. Colonies appearing on a plate that has no background lawn may not be revertants but colonies that arise due to the surviving bacteria that live off the histidine present in the agar and therefore should not be scored. To check whether colonies are true revertants they should be streaked out onto minimal plates containing biotin but no histidine. True revertants will be able to grow, whereas microcolonies arising due to toxicity will not. Furthermore, if the background lawn is thin compared to the control, it indicates toxicity of the chemical to the bacteria. If the amount of histidine in the agar is increased, mutagenesis may be enhanced but will also cause a heavy growth of the background lawn obscuring the revertants. Spontaneous reversion Spontaneous reversion (to histidine independence) should be measured routinely and can be expressed as the number of spontaneous revertants per plate. The number of spontaneous revertants is dependent on two populations: i) pre-existing mutants in the inoculum; and ii) mutants arising following divisions on the plate. The amount of histidine present is the limiting factor because the more bacteria plated the fewer divisions are possible, and thus fewer "plate" mutants will arise. Each tester strain should revert spontaneously at a frequency that is characteristic of the strain. The number of spontaneous revertants per plate should be completely independent of the initial number of bacterial cells plated within the limits of 105-108 cells (i.e. the histidine concentration within the agar is constant and, therefore, the background level of bacteria should also be constant). The number of spontaneous revertants varies between experiments, therefore it is recommended that at least three control plates are included for each strain in a mutagenicity assay. This is especially important when the mutagen is weak. Any deviation from a laboratories historical range (as a guide, without S9:- TA98, 10-50; TA100, 60-220; TA1535, 5-50; TA1537, 1-25; TA102, 250-500; but these may differ slightly in the presence of S9) is an indication that the genetic characteristics of the strain may have altered and this should be tested. Each laboratory should establish its own historical range as these ranges are likely to vary from laboratory to laboratory. Abnormally high spontaneous reversion may indicate contamination or the accumulation of back mutations by repeated sub-culturing. If this occurs the strain should be recovered by re-isolation from the frozen master copy. Spontaneous reversions are influenced by histidine concentration and, consequently, fluctuations in the histidine content of the agar will be reflected in fluctuations of the number of spontaneous revertants on the plate. Consistently high spontaneous values not attributable to the histidine concentration can sometimes be traced to mutagens in the environment of the bacteria. Ethylene oxide (used to sterilise plastic ware) is a potent mutagen for TA1535 and TA100. Residues of ethylene oxide in the plates can greatly increase the number of revertant colonies of these strains. It is essential that any plastic ware used is not sterilised using this reagent. Checking for strain characteristics Histidine requirement The His- character of the tester strains should be confirmed by demonstrating the histidine requirement for growth on selective agar plates. The uvrB deletion extends through the biotin gene, hence the need for biotin in those strains possessing the uvrB mutation. These essential components can be added to minimal glucose agar before the test plates are poured or they can be applied to the surface of minimal glucose agar plates and incorporated into the plates using a glass spreader. A sample of the cultures is streaked across a biotin control plate and then a histidine-biotin plate. The plates are incubated overnight at 37°C and examined for growth on the histidine-biotin plates. There should be no growth on the control plates. The bio gene cannot be reverted, therefore it is not necessary to test for biotin requirement. Ampicillin resistance This factor should be checked routinely because the ampicillin resistant R factor is somewhat unstable and can be lost from the bacteria. A small amount of ampicillin solution should be streaked out on the surface of a nutrient agar plate and allowed to dry. Cross-streak the culture to be tested against the ampicillin. Cultures should be incubated for 12-24 hours at 37°C. Strains which do not contain the R factor (TA1535 and TA1537) will show a zone of growth inhibition around the ampicillin streak, whereas R factor-containing strains will not. N.B. Ampicillin resistance is a convenient marker enabling testing for the presence of the plasmid but it has nothing to do with the increased sensitivity of the strains to reversion by mutagens. rfa character The rfa character of the tester strains is confirmed by determining crystal violet sensitivity. The rfa mutation permits large molecules, such as crystal violet, to enter and kill the bacteria. Fresh culture is added to top agar, vortexed, and poured onto a nutrient agar plate. Crystal violet is added to the centre of sterile filter paper and transferred to the seeded plates and the disc is pressed lightly to embed it slightly. The plate is incubated inverted. A clear zone of inhibition appears around the disc, indicating the presence of the rfa mutation. uvrB mutation The uvrB deletion is quite stable and is not easily lost from bacteria but its presence can be easily confirmed by demonstrating UV sensitivity. Streak the strain across a nutrient agar plate and cover half the plate with cardboard (half of each bacterial streak should be covered). The plate is irradiated for 6 seconds in the case of Non R factor strains (TA1535 and TA1537) and for 8 seconds in the case of R- factor strains (TA98 and TA100). Strains with the uvrB deletion will only grow on the un-irradiated side of the plate. Strain TA102 does not possess the uvrB deletion and is a useful control culture for these tests. S9 fraction For optimal mutagenesis with a particular compound, the amount of S9 per plate is critical. Too much as well as too little S9 can drastically lower the sensitivity. Each new batch of S9 prepared should be routinely checked with several compounds (e.g. benzo[a]pyrene, 2-acetylaminofluorene, 2-aminofluorene, aflatoxin B1).

TEST STATUS

Validated

REFERENCES

  1. Ames, B.N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki, E. (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31, 347-364.
  2. Booth, S.C., Welch, A.M. & Garner, R.C. (1980) Some factors affecting mutant numbers in the Salmonella/microsome assay. Carcinogenesis, 1, 911-923.
  3. Garner, R.C. (1979) Carcinogen prediction in the laboratory: a personal view. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B, 205, 121-134.
  4. Gatehouse, D.G., Wilcox, P., Forster, R., Rowland, I. & Callender, R.D. (1990) Bacterial mutation assays. In "Basic Mutagenicity Tests. UKEMS Recommended Procedures." Report of the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Ed D.J. Kirkland. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Jagannath, D.R. & Brusick, D.J. (1983) Mutagens and Carcinogens in Bacteria. In A Guide to General Toxicology (eds. Homburger, F., Hayes, J.A. & Pelikan, E.W.), S. Karger AG, P.O. Box, CH-4009 Basel, Switzerland, pp 344-364.
  6. Mahon, G.A.T., Green, M.H.L., Middleton, B., Mitchell, I. de G., Robinson, W.D. & Tweats, D.J. (1989) Analysis of data from microbial colony assays. In: Statistical evaluation of mutagenicity test data. Report of the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Part III. (ed. D.J. Kirkland). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Maron, D.M. & Ames, B.N. (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Res., 113, 173-215.
  8. De Serres, F.J. & Shelby, M.D. (1979) Recommendations on data production and analysis using the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Res., 64, 159-165.
  9. Sugimura, T., Sato, S., Nagoa, M., Yahagi, T., Matsushima, T., Seino, Y., Takeuchi, M. & Kawachi, T. (1976) Overlapping of carcinogens and mutagens. In: Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention (eds. Magee, P.N., Takayama, S., Sugimura, T. & Matsushima, T.) University of Tokyo Press/Baltimore University Park Press, pp 191-215.
  10. Venitt, S., Forester, R. & Longstaff, E. (1983) Bacterial Mutation Assays. In Report of the UKEMS Sub-Committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Part 1. Basic Test Battery. Ed. B.J. Dean. United Kingdom Environmental Mutagen Society, Swansea, pp5-40.

IP-30 © January 1992