I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
I
N
V
I
T
T
O
X
O
N
-
L
I
N
E
|
Protocol no. 44
CELL CULTURE PHOTOTOXICITY TEST
Human A431 cells and mouse 3T3 cells are exposed
in culture to UV light both in the presence and absence of test compound.
Phototoxicity is expressed as a decrease in cell viability as determined
by the MTT assay.
CONTACT
Dr. P.A. Duffy
I.C.I. Pharmaceuticals Safety of Medicines Department
Mereside Alderley Park Cheshire, SK10 4TG UK Tel: England - 625 512758
RATIONALE
Phototoxicity can be classified as an abnormal
cutaneous response which occurs as a result of exposure to ultraviolet
(UV) light or visible radiation and is associated with the presence of
xenobiotic (which may be present locally or systemically in the body).
This test is designed to mimic such a response by subjecting cell cultures
to increasing periods of exposure to UV illumination in the absence and
presence of test compounds (at concentrations previously demonstrated to
have no cytotoxic effect). Subsequent, post-exposure, cell growth is determined
using the MTT assay (the basis for which is outlined below). Increased
exposure to UV light leads to an inhibition of cell growth and a decrease
in cell viability. If this detrimental effect is significantly potentiated
in the presence of a test chemical it may be considered a likely phototoxic
agent. Use of the MTT assay The tetrazolium salt, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium
bromide (MTT), is taken up into cells and reduced by a mitochondrial dehydrogenase
enzyme to yield a purple formazan product which is largely impermeable
to cell membranes, thus resulting in its accumulation within healthy cells.
Solubilisation of the cells results in the liberation of the product which
can readily be detected using a simple colorimetric assay. The intracellular
reduction of MTT is thus indicative of the normal functional biochemistry
of energy-requiring mitochondrial enzyme reactions and, more broadly, provides
a means to estimate the number of viable cells.
BASIC PROCEDURE
Cytotoxicity Assay Monolayers of human A431 epidermal
cells or mouse 3T3 cells are exposed to increasing concentrations of test
chemical for 24 hours, after which time the cell number/viability is determined
by the colorimetric MTT assay. The highest concentration of each chemical
at which no reduction in cell viability is observed (compared to the control
situation) is recorded as being the "no effect" concentration.
Phototoxicity Assay Monolayers are incubated for 4 hours then exposed to
UVA or a combination of UVA and UVB light for increasing periods of time,
both in the absence and presence (at the "no effect" concentration)
of test chemical. The cultures are incubated for a further 20 hours, after
which viability is determined by the MTT assay. The formation of formazan
product is plotted against the time of exposure to UV and the ID50 value,
i.e. that dose of UV that reduces cell viability to 50% of control levels,
calculated from the curves. The ID50 values in the absence and presence
of test compounds are then compared. A compound is considered of phototoxic
potential when the ID50 value in the presence of test compound is significantly
less than that which occurs in its absence.
CRITICAL ASSESSMENT
This method provides a rapid, relatively inexpensive,
simple to perform method for screening many compounds for potential phototoxicity.
The test conditions can be strictly controlled with regard to time period
of exposure and wavelength of light. UV light is used because it contains
the wavelengths most often associated with phototoxic reactions. There
is, however, a very small number of chemicals activated by light from within
the visible part of the spectrum. The test avoids a number of problems
associated with human testing such as variability due to skin thickness,
pigmentation and pharmacokinetic and metabolic handling of the compound.
These factors must, however, be considered when attempting to extrapolate
and interpret results in relation to likely in vivo phototoxicity. The
main difference to the in vivo situation is that the test is based on the
exposure of test chemical in contact with only a monolayer of one type
of cell. The cell lines used reflect the types of cell present at the site
of activity, i.e. the skin. While the phototoxic insult is a biophysical
one, and might therefore be expected to produce the same reaction in most
types of cell, significant differences have nevertheless been observed
in the sensitivities of A431 epidermal cells and 3T3 fibroblasts. This
could be due to cell lineage specific biochemical characteristics. The
use of two cell types reduces the chances of missing a specific phototoxin.
A further consideration is the lack of a metabolic activation component.
However, it appears from the literature that hepatic metabolism is not
greatly involved in the production of molecules that are subsequently activated
by UV light to phototoxic products. The porphyria type of photoinduced
dermal reactions are one exception. If, however, hepatic metabolism was
considered to be of potential significance in relation to a given test
compound, the inclusion of an hepatic S9 microsomal metabolic activation
system would only require slight modification of the protocol. The MTT
assay as an end-point Formation of the formazan product has been found
to correlate well with cell viability in terms of normal functioning of
mitochondrial energy-requiring biochemical reactions. The assay compares
favourably with several other methods used in the determination of cell
number/viability e.g. dye exclusion. It is a rapid, sensitive, relatively
simple to perform and lends itself to semi-automation. It should be noted,
however, that the MTT assay is not readily adaptable for use with static
cell populations or those of low mitochondrial activity. Certain compounds
may selectively affect the mitochondria of the cells resulting in a greatly
overestimated level of toxicity. A recent paper (Plumb et al., 1989) draws
attention to the possible influence of pH on the MTT reaction. However,
this effect should not be of any significance in the assay as used in the
Phototoxicity Test.
TEST STATUS
Undergoing in-house development
CHEMICALS TESTED
p-Aminobenzoic acid (PABA)
Amiodarone
Aspirin
Benoxaprofen
Benzalkonium chloride
Benzoic acid
Chlorpromazine
Demeclocycline
Diazepam
Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)
Diphenhydramine
Dithranol
Doxycycline
Ethynyloestradiol
Griseofulvin
Hexachlorophene
Hydrochlorothiazide
Hydrocortisone
Imipramine
7-Methoxycoumarin
5-Methoxypsoralen
8-Methoxypsoralen
Methyl-DOPA
Nalidixic acid
Piroxicam
Promethazine
Protryptyline
Tetracycline
Vinblastine
Vitamin A
REFERENCES
- Barnes, D. (1987) In vitro growth of A431 human
epidermoid carcinoma. Methods in Enzymology, 146, 88-92.
- Duffy, P.A., Bennett, A., Roberts, M. & Flint,
O.P. (1987) Prediction of phototoxic potential using human A431 cells and
mouse 3T3 cells. Molecular Toxicology, 1, 579-587.
- Duffy, P.A., Bennett, A., Roberts, M. & Flint,
O.P. (1989) The prediction of phototoxic potential using human A431 cells
and mouse 3T3 cells. In: In Vitro Toxicology : New Directions (Alternative
Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 7) (ed. Goldberg, A.M.) Mary Ann Liebert Inc.,
New York. pp. 327-335.
- Giard, D.J., Aranson, S.A. & Todaro, G.J.
(1973) In vitro cultivation of human tumours: Established cell lines derived
from a series of solid tumours. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 1, 1417-1427.
- Hawk, J.L.M. (1984) Photosensitizing agents used
in the United Kingdom. Clin. & Exp. Dermatol., 9, 300-302.
- Mosmann, T. (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for
cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity
assays. J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55-63.
- Plumb, J.A., Milroy, R & Kaye, S.B. (1989)
Effects of the pH dependence of 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide - Formazan absorption on chemosensitivity. Cancer Research,
49, 4435-4440
- Todaro, G.J. & Green, H. (1963) Qualitative
studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development
into established cell lines. J. Cell Biol., 17, 299-313.
IP-44 © June 199
|